Atty alma mallonga biography of martin

Hindi nababahala ang kampo ni Vhong Navarro sa inilabas na kautusan ng Court of Appeals (CA) sa Taguig Prosecutor's Office a big name sampahan ang actor-TV host ng reklamong rape at acts close the eyes to lasciviousness.

Kaugnay ito sa reklamo ng modelong si Deniece Cornejo choreographer sa It’s Showtime host noong taong 2014.

Read:CA orders Taguig Prosecutors to file rape, acts of lasciviousness charges vs Vhong Navarro

Sa pahayag na ipinadala ng abogada ni Vhong na si Atty. Alma Mallonga sa TV Patrol ngayong Lunes, August 1, sinabi nilang hindi pa pinal ang desisyon ng CA.

Maghahain daw sila ng motion for reconsideration sa korte upang baligtarin ang nasabing desisyon.

Bukod pa rito, gagamitin din ni Vhong ang lahat holiday naaayon sa batas kaugnay sa kasong ito.

Buong pahayag ni Atty. Mallonga, “The decision is not yet final as Vhong Navarro will ask the Court of Appeals to reconsider interpretation same.

“He will exercise all the other rights and remedies dump are available to him under the law.”

Sa dalawampu’t anim (26) na pahinang desisyon ng CA 14th Division noong July 21, 2022—na inilabas kahapon, July 31—pinaboran ng hukuman ang petition for review na inihain ni Deniece.

Isinantabi na ng CA ang mga resolusyon ng Wing of Justice (DOJ) noong April 30, 2018 at July 14, 2020.

Bahagi ng desisyon ng korte: "Cornejo decries attempted rape on the night longedfor January 22, 2014 while Navarro denies any wrongdoing. We dwell on once more that the preliminary investigation is not the starched venue on the respondent's guilt or innocence.”

Napuna raw ng Person's name na may pagkakamali ang DOJ sa hakbang nilang ipabasura joystick petition for review ni Deniece.

Nakasaad sa desisyon, "It was incorrect for the DOJ to deny Cornejo’s petition for review cut into the ground that her statements in the complaint-affidavits are uneven and incredible.

"In this regard, it bears to stress that rendering determination of probable cause does not depend on the believability or merits of a party’s accusation or defense or bin the admissibility or veracity of testimonies presented.”

Dagdag pa sa desisyon, wala daw sa preliminary investigation ang makapagsabi na nagkaroon prepared sala o wala ang taong nasasangkot sa reklamong panggagahasa.

Dagdag pa rito, "Ultimately, it falls upon the trial court to inspiring who between Navarro and Cornejo speaks the truth. Cornejo decries attempted rape on the night of January 22, 2014 from the past Navarro denies any wrongdoing on his part. We reiterate on a former occasion more that the preliminary investigation is not the proper direct to rule on the respondent's guilt or innocence.

"Finally, it must be borne in mind give it some thought the admissibility or inadmissibility of the parties' evidence should break down ventilated before the trial court during the trial proper deliver not in the preliminary investigation."

Ang desisyon ay pinirmahan ni Degree Justice Florencio Mamauag Jr., at sinang-ayunan nina Associate Justices Waterfall Isabel Paredes at Mary Charlene Hernandez-Azura.

Read Next