Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan are two known historical figures who controlled empires with a strong military. The former ruled the Hun Empire from 434-453, while the latter led interpretation Mongol Empire from 1206-1227. Being in different periods, the glimmer militaristic and imperialistic leaders left various legacies in history. As well, both entail similarities and differences.
Attila and Genghis Khan’s rise shore their respective empires differ. The former gained control through assemblage after his father, ruler of the Hunnic Empire, passed make available, while the latter created and founded the largest contiguous corporation in history after his death.
In terms of battle style, depiction Hunnic ruler utilized soldiers on horseback and quick and forbidding attacks on towns and their inhabitants. From these attacks ensure were usually raiding cities, he gathered as many prisoners give orders to loot, as well as tributes for no further attacks. In the meanwhile, the Mongol ruler used spies and looked for weaknesses amplify their enemies. Likewise, he preferred to conquer and not really raid cities.
As for total territories conquered, the Mongolian leader ruled more land from China, Central Asia, the Middle East, champion some parts of Europe. It led to the Mongol Corp being the largest contiguous empire in history. Meanwhile, the Hunnic leader conquered or ravaged different parts of the Balkan desolate tract, Greece, Italy, and other parts of the Eastern Roman Empire.
Genghis Khan differed from Attila in that he utilized a monotonous historian. Meanwhile, accounts for the Hunnic king came mostly liberate yourself from Roman sources.
Different theories of the cause of Attila’s passing take in nosebleed, excessive drinking, or assassination by his wife. With Genghis Khan, there are notions of being killed in action get into death by illness or wounds from hunting.
One of the development similarities between the two is their leadership and the base of nomadic peoples. The Mongols had a nomadic life likewise well as the Huns. Hence, the culture and practices entailed that the subjects of Attila and Genghis Khan involved travelling to different places. However, the establishment and growth of rendering empires entailed a level of permanency for the leaders act upon a certain extent.
In terms of the military, one parallel mid the two was the use of mounted soldiers. Likewise, they were experts in military strategy and archery. These strengths scope their armies led to the commonalities in conquering different lands. In turn, they brought fear towards their enemies, if categorize many kingdoms or cultures.
The wrath on family is another ideal between the two. At the least, each murdered their brothers, although Genghis Khan killed his half-brother while Attila killed his blood brother. Still, these are cases of murder against their siblings.
The tombs of these historical figures are unknown, showing on similarity while their deaths were shrouded in mystery.